LANDER for the record...

for the record I only act this way towards You and your posse of DANNYmays on this Iraq issue(radio,banned,Ivan,grantt,dannymay,froggy etc) and have only been doing it lately. I tried to show you respect lander up till this afternoon when you JUMPED into the bandwagon with these fools that ALWAYS ATTACK LOGIC.So take a BRAIN PILL.

I started with NOTHING and built everything I own.
I didn't start out as a spoiled little rich kid as accused by you.

I don't do business with fools like you guys and know how to deal with all types of personalities in business. This is a forum dude, and it's getting worse EVERYDAY with the like of you and your POSSE of DannyMays.

and BTW learn how to READ...I wrote look at my last T-H-R-E-A-D...not last post you silly man.

 

I don't know any of the "posse" you mentioned.
It's obvious that your world is black & white. You're too simple to see beyond this simplistic approach. I don't hang with those cats, I don't follow the liberals, I don't follow anyone. You are unable to understand that a world with out stereotypes exists. One could call that uneducated, I call it ignorant.

Since you're a man of "LOGIC", then explain this to me ...

The Bush administration says that Iraq may be attacked because Iraq violated UN resolutions.

Clearly, this reasoning imply that if Iraq must comply with the UN, then the UN is the aurthority in power.

The Bush administration contiunes to say that it has the right and may attack without the consent of the UN.

This is illogical , Mr. "man of logic" ...
... either the UN is the authority figure or it is not. It is not the authority when it is convient for the US's agenda, but not the authority when the US disagrees. Look past the flag and you'll see there is a world that is disgusted with this arrogence. I am not satisfied with this approach, but by no means does that make me unpatriotic, rather it makes me want to improve our country.

When GW makes a logic case for war & offers evidence that war is the only way, then I too will support him, but I will not support this cause for war until that day.

If you too loved America, I would think you would want to improve it, not seek to dismiss those who disagree with it's policies as "unpatriotic".

I don't like you. I don't like people like you. Not because you're republican, not because you're conservative, but rather because you're an arrogance imp that thinks that screaming the loudest makes him right.

Fuk you and your companies.
btw - let's see your little internation business ... surely you're not lying.
web addresses will do just fine.

 

I'm NOT going to even finish reading this LONG POLITICAL challenge post you made.

I'm DONE debating the issues with you. Even you posted awhile back that these political issues were making people argue on the Rx with each other etc and they shouldn't be here in the forum.

I'm probably twice your age and have much more worldly/business/political experience than you but you don't care about experience or logic that comes from it. You think you know all the answers but you haven't really been anywhere, or have seen what goes on in 3rd world coountries etc.

I will talk to you back in the main forum when you want to talk sports or gambling. OK?

 

no not ok. you CLEARLY said that I attack logic ...
... but, my profession is based on logic. My beliefs are based on logic. That is what I am.

I ask you to attack my reasoning as effectively as you attack liberals, opposition & minorities.
Since you have so much knowledge & you're so worldly, then my question should be relatively east for a man like you to answer. so, again I ask ...

"Since you're a man of "LOGIC", then explain this to me ...

The Bush administration says that Iraq may be attacked because Iraq violated UN resolutions.

Clearly, this reasoning imply that if Iraq must comply with the UN, then the UN is the aurthority in power.

The Bush administration contiunes to say that it has the right and may attack without the consent of the UN.

This is illogical , Mr. "man of logic" ...
... either the UN is the authority figure or it is not. It is not the authority when it is convient for the US's agenda, but not the authority when the US disagrees. Look past the flag and you'll see there is a world that is disgusted with this arrogence. I am not satisfied with this approach, but by no means does that make me unpatriotic, rather it makes me want to improve our country.
"

Me thinks you put your foot in your mouth.

btw - still waiting for the web addresses of your international businesses.

 

maybe he left for class?

 

.

 

^

the world of logic is still awaiting your response.

 

Lander.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I ask you to attack my reasoning as effectively as you attack liberals, opposition & minorities. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I'm not a conservitive or a conservitive that attacks liberals as you KEEP stating and I don't attack minorites, I am a minority YOU FOOL! where the hell did you get that one? I guess you're just assuming AGAIN!

It seems that you and that AmetuerSleuth character try to drum up trouble when there is isn't any, and you try to label people who are not racist as racist for your own satisfaction.

When did I say the label: I'm a man of Logic? Those are your words, Lander. As you attack logic everytime I read a political thread that you are in.

The U.N. is a weak orginization that usually and HISTORICALLY makes the WRONG decisions on world matters. WWII is the best example. Not knowing HOW to enforce resolution 1441 is another. The trouble is that people who live in 3rd world countries are not able to be well informed on the real issues at stake and they are conditioned by their crooked politicians not to TRUST America, and that is B.S. As they do not have freedom in there own countries. Look at Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq etc.

The U.N. only exists because the U.S. is just pacifying these diplomats and small countries while we keep tabs on them. Too many small and unstable countries have nuclear weapons that do not have the mentality on how to keep them or if they should ever use them.
Remember the U.S. invented them and the old communist Russia stole them from us and sold the technology to others.
The U.S. have the best track record and qualifications to be in charge of weapon on this planet. No other country qualifies. Nobody.

We used the Atom bomb only twice to stop the Kamikaze Japanese generals that would not stop fighting the war even though they lost. It had to be done back then as it save million of JAPANESE lives and others.

And we have NEVER used WMD since. So many of these so-called U.N. diplomats do not understand how it works and are swayed by political B.S. instead of logic.

So to answer your question...and it's NOT a simple question to answer...the U.S. is the authority BUT we will listen to what those (American hating diplomats) U.N. diplotmats have to say.

By the way it's 8pm here.

BTW I have a 2 software companies and supply other companies with software and state of the art games, as well as banking software And have no reason to give you any of our addresses.

 

So you're saying that the UN is capable of making decision for Iraq, but uncapable of making decisions for the US?
And further, you view ignoring a UN vote against Iraq because Iraq ignored the UN a duty of the US?

This is a hypocyrtical stance, explaining in part the lack of world support behind an attack.
I think you suffer for a severely sad case of egocentrism. You need help.

"When did I say the label: I'm a man of Logic? Those are your words, Lander. As you attack logic everytime I read a political thread that you are in."

You said that I attacked your post, then you said I attacked logic ... one would presume since I attacked only one thing that you perceive yourself as synonymous with logic.
It's not that complex.

Still waiting for the web address of your internation business. Anyone can claim to be anything & frankly, you're irrationality make it hard to believe people be willing to work with you.

 

As usual you DO NOT Constructively DEBATE you just ARGUE.

You asked me who I thought the authority was I I answered you. And then you ATTACK THE U.S. like your an anti-American hating middle eastern etc.

And I am not here to advertising my companies nor do I need some whacko like you around.
I don't have anything to prove here as I know what and who I am, and do not have to prove to you how much I am worth. Or what I do as I value my privacy and have too much to you already.

The things you say are childish and FILLED with jealousy.

But I suppose you want to go on and on and on.

Do you fight with your family and kids this way too?

Please post your reply HighLander and let's be done with it you DEMANDING son of a bitch that is nothing more than a thorn in my side, As I TOOK THE TIME to answer you with a long reply and you just FIRE BACK angry and MORE B.S.

You should work for Suddam as you talk and twist things the SAME WAY AS HE DOES.

 

So you're saying that the UN is capable of making decision for Iraq, but uncapable of making decisions for the US?
And further, you view ignoring a UN vote against Iraq because Iraq ignored the UN a duty of the US?

This is a hypocyrtical stance, explaining in part the lack of world support behind an attack.

This is logic. Logic is fact regardless if you like it.

Childish?
Was threatening to leave 8 times today childish?
Was posting a poll should I leave childish?
Was saying "ugh.. you just mad cause your dick is small" childish?
Was saying "I own business across the world, but I'm telling you where" childish?
Was calling my stance "jealousy" childish?
Was wishing that other poster be sent to Iraq childish?
Was saying I should work for Sadam childish?

I'm asking you to explain how you justify an illogical stance by the US & you're twisting it saying i'm anti-american, anti-logic, pro-sadam ... you haven't said a rational thing is this whole debate. You have wished people be sent to Iraq to fight and die - I believe you are the angry one.

Afterall you were the one that went a frezy about leaving (until you saw that few cared)

Please, respond to the first paragraph logically. I'm not interested in your self-abortion, your ranting, your raving or your name calling - just the facts will do.

 

I did answer your question. The U.S. is the authority. Not a bunch of 3rd world drunk diplomats that are unexperienced. PLEASE read it again.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Childish?
Was threatening to leave 8 times today childish?
Was posting a poll should I leave childish?
Was saying "ugh.. you just mad cause your dick is small" childish?
Was saying "I own business across the world, but I'm telling you where" childish?
Was calling my stance "jealousy" childish?
Was wishing that other poster be sent to Iraq childish?
Was saying I should work for Sadam childish? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

This was all done for you, and the dannymay's and Radio's here. Yesterday danny posted the SAME type of post/arguement about 20 -30 times yesterday.
And RADIO has the same attack on the U.S. everyday.

I was going to leave at the end of the day today until the news about Royal came up.
Like you care?

I may stick around for that, but as I stated today as well that When the new political forum opens up and fools like you geniuses GO AWAY I might come back as this is a sports/gambling forum and NOT Lander's playhouse.

And RADIO I didn't know you were a HOMOSEXUAL

Bye Bye boys...

 

Aren't you unclever?

You don't answer because you can't. That Simple.

All talk, no thought.

 

[SECprophet]

Lander >>

Just curious, why is your avatar so damn big? Is it true what they say about guys with big avatars? lol.


GL!

___________________________________________________________________

Plus ça change, Plus c'est la même chose

 

The answer is because he wishes his little limp penis was BIGGER

Kind of like little guys that drive BIG TRUCKS

BUTT ugly guys that buy Ferarri's thinking it will get them chick's

But the real answer is it's the photo of his BOYFRIEND that gives him head after they watch the game together

LOL

 

The intellect of a cultured international businessman

When in doubt resort to insults, right?
Much better than logic or facts.

 

But hey ... I'd be bitter too if I was an old man circumstanced into working out of a hut in a 3rd World Country in the middle of the Carribean. The isolation would surely make me anti-social & account for a intense lack of reality .... and the anger problems, well .. some people are just pissed off at what there lives have resorted to - defending America from abroad because he couldn't back it back in good ole' USA ...

... then again we could just make stories up about owning business across the globe

 

Just joking with SEC... man your uptight!

You're the one with THE ANGER.

I still have my house in California dude

I live and work in a beautiful place with beautiful people and we have dinner with fantasic sunsets everynight. Not to mention great beaches and lots of water sports.

But I guess you don't like any of the above...LOL

I have a beautiful young wife from my home state and don't have to prove ANYTHING to a little ANGRY worker like you.

I come and go to the U.S. whenever I want. So what's your problem?

I worked very hard to get where I am as it wasn't easy, as I am a honest businessman unlike some of the Pirates here in the Caribbean.

Bye Bye Lander and work hard and one day you too can live in the Caribbean or where ever you want to.

 

[8isenough]

Seaside Terrace Lobster

 

They have good food.

But my wives cooking is still the best!

As I know what I'm eating